diff options
author | tpearson <tpearson@283d02a7-25f6-0310-bc7c-ecb5cbfe19da> | 2011-01-07 03:45:53 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | tpearson <tpearson@283d02a7-25f6-0310-bc7c-ecb5cbfe19da> | 2011-01-07 03:45:53 +0000 |
commit | 10308be19ef7fa44699562cc75946e7ea1fdf6b9 (patch) | |
tree | 4bc444c00a79e88105f2cfce5b6209994c413ca0 /kparts/COMMENTS | |
parent | 307136d8eef0ba133b78ceee8e901138d4c996a1 (diff) | |
download | tdelibs-10308be19ef7fa44699562cc75946e7ea1fdf6b9.tar.gz tdelibs-10308be19ef7fa44699562cc75946e7ea1fdf6b9.zip |
Revert automated changes
Sorry guys, they are just not ready for prime time
Work will continue as always
git-svn-id: svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/branches/trinity/kdelibs@1212479 283d02a7-25f6-0310-bc7c-ecb5cbfe19da
Diffstat (limited to 'kparts/COMMENTS')
-rw-r--r-- | kparts/COMMENTS | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kparts/COMMENTS b/kparts/COMMENTS index 9c6142b23..e3e4d8589 100644 --- a/kparts/COMMENTS +++ b/kparts/COMMENTS @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ the BarPosition of the toolbars is solved. Nice :-) (David) Not sure we want to save whether the statusbar is shown/hidden. -(Simon) Another thought: Perhaps we should store the tqgeometry information of +(Simon) Another thought: Perhaps we should store the geometry information of the containers of the KPartHost in the KPart itself? (something like KPart-Session Management ;-) (David) Sounds strange (the child taking care of its host's containers...) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ I think what it wants is "really" activated, no ? gets activated", in this simple model (no Document/View). The Part gets activated when you can see its items in the menus/toolbars, there is no "in between" IMO ? 2 - Remind me what konq does with the *bars when a part gets activated ? -I couldn't tqfind anything with a quick grep in the sources... +I couldn't find anything with a quick grep in the sources... I'm still looking for an example when it's useful :) (Simon) I think that's the whole idea of making KPartManager independent from @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ changes. -------------------------- -David wondering about tqStatus Bar +David wondering about Status Bar -------------------------------- Should the statusbar be a *bar like toolbar/menubar, handled by the XML GUI building (soon "KPartsMainWindow"), and shown/hidden depending on the @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ issue compared to what's above though. delegation. It works like this: We have KReadOnlyPart (short KROP) and KonqyViewerExtension (short KVE). KVE is just - a child of KROP that you can query with the TQObject::child method. + a child of KROP that you can query with the QObject::child method. Views which are konquy aware feature their own implementation of KVE and konquy is happy :-) If a KROP does not feature a KVE then Konqui installs a default KVE that just ignores |